|
Krebiozen
|
|
Related Terms
- 1-methyl-2-amino-imidazol-4-one, 1-methylglycocyamidine, 1-methylhydantoin, 1-methylhydantoin-2-imide, 2-imino-1,5-dihydro-1-methyl-4H-imidazol-4-one, 2-amino-1,5-dihydro-1-methyl, 2-imino-1,5-dihydro-1-methyl-4H-imidazol-4-one, 2-imino-1-methyl-4-imidazolidinone, 2-imino-1-methylimidazolidin-4-one, 4H-imidazol-4-one,2-amino-1,5-dihydro-1-methyl, 45514-66-7, 60-27-5, 82016-55-5, AI3-15321, AIDS166904, C00791, CHEMBANK986, creatine monohydrate, creatinine, creatinine (VAN) (8CI), EINECS 200-466-7, heated creatinine, mineral oil, NISTC60275, NSC-8752 injections, NSC13123, substance X, ZINC00895382, ZINC00967189.
|
Background
- It is claimed that krebiozen, originally called substance X, came from horses inoculated with Actinomyces bovis by Dr. Stevan Durovic. Durovic claimed that krebiozen had been useful in the treatment of spontaneous cancer, mainly in cats and dogs. It is unclear what kreboizin really contained; in some cases it was found to be creatine monohydrate and in other cases it contained mineral oil and l-methylhydantoin, a product of heating creatine monohydrate.
- Several studies have failed to show beneficial results from kreboizen. Reports published by the Krebiozen Foundation found improvement in cancer patients, but these results were disproven by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the National Cancer Institute. Dr. Andrew Ivy (University of Illinois), Dr. Stevan Durovic, and Marko Durovic were brought to trial for violations of FDA regulations. There is currently no scientific proof that krebiozen is a viable treatment option for high blood pressure, cancer remission or any other condition.
|
|
 |
|
Evidence Table
|
These uses have been tested in humans or animals. Safety and effectiveness have not always been proven. Some of these conditions are potentially serious, and should be evaluated by a qualified healthcare provider. |
GRADE * |
* Key to grades
A: Strong scientific evidence for this use B: Good scientific evidence for this use C: Unclear scientific evidence for this use D: Fair scientific evidence for this use (it may not work) F: Strong scientific evidence against this use (it likley does not work)
|
|
Tradition / Theory
The below uses are based on tradition, scientific theories, or limited research. They often have not been thoroughly tested in humans, and safety and effectiveness have not always been proven. Some of these conditions are potentially serious, and should be evaluated by a qualified healthcare provider. There may be other proposed uses that are not listed below.
- Bilateral pneumonectomy (surgical removal of lung), bladder cancer, cancer (breast, cervical), high blood pressure.
|
DosingAdults (over 18 years old)
- There is no proven safe or effective dose for kreboizen in adults.
Children (under 18 years old)
- There is no proven safe or effective dose for kreboizen, and use in children is not recommended.
|
Safety
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration does not strictly regulate herbs and supplements. There is no guarantee of strength, purity or safety of products, and effects may vary. You should always read product labels. If you have a medical condition, or are taking other drugs, herbs, or supplements, you should speak with a qualified healthcare provider before starting a new therapy. Consult a healthcare provider immediately if you experience side effects.
Allergies
- Avoid in individuals with a known allergy or hypersensitivity to creatine monohydrate.
Side Effects and Warnings
- There is insufficient evidence to support the use of krebiozen. Patients should be made aware of the existing treatment options for their specific conditions, particularly treatments with demonstrated efficacy. Pain and mild icterus (jaundice) have been reported. Avoid use in patients with cancer as only negative data has been published.
Pregnancy & Breastfeeding
- Kreboizen is not recommended in pregnant or breastfeeding women due to a lack of available scientific evidence.
|
InteractionsInteractions with Drugs
- Insufficient available evidence.
Interactions with Herbs & Dietary Supplements
- Insufficient available evidence.
|
Attribution
-
This information is based on a systematic review of scientific literature edited and peer-reviewed by contributors to the Natural Standard Research Collaboration (www.naturalstandard.com).
|
Bibliography
- Anon. STATUS report on "krebiozen". J Am Med Assoc 1951;147(9):864-873.
- Anon. Unproven methods of cancer management. Krebiozen and carcalon. CA Cancer J Clin 1973;23(2):111-115.
- Beck M. [Remedies and quackeries]. Acta Pharm Hung 1999;69(1):5-8.
- Holland JF. The krebiozen story. Is cancer quackery dead? JAMA 1967;200(3):213-218.
- Jallut O, Guex P, Barrelet L. [Unproven methods in oncology]. Schweiz Med Wochenschr 1984;114(36):1214-1220.
- Janssen WF. Cancer quackery--the past in the present. Semin Oncol 1979;6(4):526-536.
- Langer E. The Krebiozen case: what happened in Chicago. Science 1966;151(714):1061-1064.
- Stolinsky DC, Bateman JR. Recurrent masses at sites of prior Krebiozen (NSC-8752) injections. Cancer Chemother Rep 1974;58(2):249-250.
|
Copyright © 2011 Natural Standard (www.naturalstandard.com)
| The information in this monograph is intended for informational purposes only, and is meant to help users better understand health concerns. Information is based on review of scientific research data, historical practice patterns, and clinical experience. This information should not be interpreted as specific medical advice. Users should consult with a qualified healthcare provider for specific questions regarding therapies, diagnosis and/or health conditions, prior to making therapeutic decisions.
| |